WHO CONTROLS KENYA’S CREATIVE
ECONOMY?
By Margaretta wa Gacheru
Kenya’s creative economy will grow and
expand by leaps and bounds when Kenyans themselves control their own artistic
output. Until then, it will be handicapped by outsiders, often ex-patriot
residents, who have their own agendas and their own interests which, though they
give lip service to helping grow our creative economy, actually deplete
artists’ incentives specifically because they are not in control of their work,
where it goes and how much is paid for it.
These are the sentiments of a number of
smart Kenyan artists who have gotten tired of dealing with middle men and women
who some see as conniving crooks, others claim are merely well-intentioned
do-gooders who don’t see the damage they do to Kenya’s creative economy..
Not all ex-patriots in the cultural field
are crooks, says Shine Tani, director of the Banana Hill Art Gallery. A man who
has been approached by numerous ex-patriots (and a few Kenyans) who want to
offer him piecemeal ‘projects’ to complete which will earn him pennies,
meanwhile the one with the proposal gets a minimum of ten times what he would
earn if he controlled setting the value of his own artwork
Often Shine has even seen ex-pats coming to
‘interview’ him, when in fact, he feels they are milking his mind for new,
original ideas, as if he were a cash cow.
Then when they come back they have
refashioned his ideas into a fancy donor proposal that will earn him a big
bundle as well as a reputation among fellow ex-pats, both here and abroad, for
now being a so-called ‘expert’ in contemporary Kenyan art.
How does he know this trick, especially
when Kenyan artists on the ground rarely see the completed project proposal,
leave alone the budget and funds to be allocated to the artists who agree to
work with the proposer?
Good question, but as Kenyan artists have
gotten more savvy as to the ways these middle men and women work, they have
found their own means of investigating and unearthing proposal documents which
are often kept secret and carefully hidden from the locals’ eyes.
Such information is not always concealed
since some middle men/women can’t help feeling proud of their achievements and
put their project ‘success stories’ in publications and other documentations
that one can find, for instance, on the Internet.
One disgruntled Kenyan artist who had been
working at one of the foreign-funded art centres based in Nairobi went to
complain to the donor (a former middle man on the art scene in the late
Nineties), but as he sat in the waiting room for the donor he found a
photograph of himself on one of the promotional newsletters of the
organization’s East African regional office.
“It was the caption under the photograph
that made me really angry,” said Wanjohi Nyamo, a scrap metal sculptor, formerly
working at Kuona Trust when it was still at the Nairobi National Museum. He
subsequently went to work at Mamba Village in Karen.
The caption referred to all the hungry
street children who were being given skills and an unprecedented opportunity
for a new life thanks to the donor’s funding of one particular art centre.
“I have never been a street boy,” said an
irate Nyamo. In fact, he had been living
and farming in Nyeri when he read an advertisement in a local daily paper
inviting anyone interested to come learn artistic skills for free at that art
centre.
“I took seriously the story in the paper
and decided to travel to Nairobi and learn new skills, which i did,” Nyamo
continued, explaining tha sense of betrayal at his discovery had been almost
overwhelming.
But it taught him an important lesson,
namely the need for locals artists not to become donor dependent and to start
seriously thinking how best to take control not only of their creative output,
but also the wider Kenyan art world.
A number of Kenyan artists have had similar
epiphanies, startling awakenings that have sometimes been painful to swallow,
but also got them thinking more about how to effectively combine their art with
a stronger sense of entrepreneurship.
A number of local artists reject getting
too involved in entrepreneurial thinking. They claim they are purists who are
only concerned with self expression and cultivating their own original ideas.
If they have to work with a middle man or woman who either takes charge of
their finances or offers them a percent of the sales of their art, they don’t
mind. They claim it is a bargain for them to leave the marketing of their art
to the middle man/woman, especially as he or she could have international
connections with East African art collectors who are willing to pay premium
prices for their work. In the process such artists feel they could also obtain
more of a global art profile.
The purists as i will call them often are
those who have already made names for themselves and could even be one of the
new breed of Kenyan contemporary artists who not only survive by the sales of
their art; they could even be thriving but not so much because they have a deal
with a middle man/woman but because they are amazingly talented and original
artists with fresh ideas and cultivated skills. Among them are gifted artists
like Peterson Kamwathi, Peter Elungat, Beatrice Wanjiku Njoroge and Richard
Kimathi.
But then there are those artists who have
spent several years working with art dealers, and who have subsequently woken
up to the extent to which they have been “had” or frankly exploited. Admitting
that they hadn’t known better at the time, nor had they seen the way the dealer
was making a minimum of 10 percent, maximum 100 percent of what the artist got
paid, some of these artists begrudgingly admit they would have starved or given
up art altogether if it hadn’t been for the art dealer buying their work at
throwaway prices.
“Sometimes those artists who sold their
work for pennies were alcoholics and earned just enough to buy the cheap booze
they were addicted to. It was a vicious cycle that few of those artists broke
out of,” said Kenyan painter Patrick Kinuthia.
“i was one of those guys for a while, but i
managed to break out of the cycle and now i don’t work with any middle men,”
added Kinuthia who today describes himself as an Independent artist who picks
and chooses where he exhibits and who he sells his popular portraiture to.
There are a number of other so-called
Independent Kenyan artists who have understood they need to take charge of
their finances as well as their artistic productivity. Artists like Joseph
Bertiers Mbatia falls into this category. What’s more, he feels so strongly
about not only the value of his own art and his ability to sell it himself but
he also has chosen to share his insights with other aspiring artists who he has
organized and regularly instructs. DARTS
the art organization he self-funds and sustains philanthropically has already
begun holding group exhibitions and a number of young artists are visibly
emerging under Bertiers’ tuition.
But then there are artists like Shine Tani
who has been painting since the mid-Eighties but in 2009 announced he was no
longer an artist but a businessman. Being manager of Banana Hill Art Gallery
had inspired him to take seriously the business of promoting and marketing
promising artists from all over East Africa. Since then he’s had a number of
successful exhibitions exposing unknown (to the Kenyan public) East African
artists who have attracted wide ranging interest.
Fortunately, Shine returned to painting in
late 2013 and held his first one-man show late the same year. Yet Shine is an
exception to the rule that too many Kenyan artists are still dependent on donor
and middle man/womn support.
Increasingly however, as artists are coming
to see the connection between their own creative output and the need to develop
Kenya’s creative economy, greater numbers are waking up to see it’s not a
hindrance to their artistic development to think more entrepreneurially. They
still have a ways to go, but many have become more like Shine who believe
Kenya’s creative economy will only grow once local artists are in control of
their own indigenous art world.
No comments:
Post a Comment